Project
Carries the new decisions
ProductsUse case · Meetings to company state
Meetings should change the work. Not create another document.
Connect every important conversation to the decisions, commitments, owners, customer context, project updates, and follow-up your team and agents need next.
Start free. Process one meeting into work another teammate can continue.
The conversationTranscript plus company context
Shared in HQUpdated company state
Owner
Receives the commitment
Next meeting
Starts from what changed
The meeting becomes context and action for the rest of the company workflow.
Decisions and commitments stay explicit
Follow-up connects to the real project
The next teammate starts from what changed
The broken workflow
The transcript is saved. The company state is not.
Teams collect recordings and summaries, then still depend on someone to remember the decision, update the project, write the follow-up, and brief the next person.
Decisions hide in prose
A summary mentions what was discussed without separating the decision, rationale, owner, and effect on the project.
Commitments lose owners
Next steps are copied into messages, but deadlines, dependencies, and accountability drift after the call.
The next conversation starts cold
Customer history, prior commitments, and unresolved decisions are searched for again before every meeting.
The HQ workflow
Move from transcript to shared company state.
HQ uses the conversation with existing company, customer, and project context, then routes the result into the work people and agents will continue.
- 01Meeting owner
Ground the conversation
Connect the meeting to the relevant customer, project, prior decisions, commitments, and open questions.
- 02HQ workflow
Extract what changed
Separate decisions, commitments, owners, signals, risks, and required updates from the general discussion.
- 03The team
Review and continue the work
Approve the follow-up, update shared project context, and hand the next action to the responsible person or agent.
Why HQ
A summary records the meeting. HQ carries it into the company.
Meeting tools remain useful for capture. HQ adds the shared context, project continuity, ownership, and follow-through around the transcript.
The layerAI meeting summaryWith HQ
ContextThe transcript and meeting titleCustomer, project, history, and prior decisions
OutputA readable recapDecisions, commitments, owners, updates, and follow-up
ContinuitySaved in the meeting archiveFeeds the next person, agent, project, and conversation
What the team can inspect
The evidence is the work that changes after the meeting.
A good workflow leaves a clear decision record, owned commitments, updated project context, and a follow-up someone can review before it is sent.
Decision record
What was decided, why, by whom, and which project or customer it changes.
Commitment ledger
Owners, next actions, timing, dependencies, and unresolved questions remain explicit.
Review-ready follow-up
The message reflects the conversation and existing relationship context before a person approves it.
What changes
Conversations produce durable momentum.
- 01
Reduce dropped decisions and commitments
- 02
Keep projects and customer context current
- 03
Make follow-up faster without losing human review
Your first win
Process one meeting all the way into action.
Do not stop at the summary. Prove the workflow by updating the shared state and handing a real next action to another participant.
Turn your next meeting into action- 1
Connect one meeting to its customer or project context
- 2
Capture decisions, commitments, owners, and required updates
- 3
Have a teammate review the follow-up and continue one action
Built for company work
People approve commitments made in their name.
HQ helps prepare and route meeting outcomes while keeping accountable people in control of sensitive communication, decisions, and external commitments.
- Clear source transcript and context
- Named owners for actions
- Review before external follow-up where required
Automated extraction can miss nuance. Material decisions and customer commitments should remain reviewable by the responsible person.
Start with one workflow
Let the next meeting begin where the last one ended.
Start with one important conversation and turn it into decisions, owners, project updates, and a reviewed next step.